Case 4101901/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Indemnis Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101901/2023
- Decision date
- 21 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under rule 21 because no response was presented by the respondent. The Employment Judge determined the claim on the ET1, the claimant's emails of 19 May 2023 and 25 July 2023, and the claimant's contract of employment and November 2022 payslip.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and awarded £716.72 for 8 days' pay covering 29 November 2022 to 8 December 2022. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract as to notice and awarded £1,940.82, being one month's pay under the contract.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,087.50, calculated as 7.5 weeks at £545 per week based on the claimant being 50 years old with 5 complete years' service. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay accrued but untaken annual leave and awarded a further £716.72 for 8 days' holiday.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award for 8 days' pay covering 29 November 2022 to 8 December 2022. | Upheld | — | £717 |
| Breach of contract | Award for one month's notice pay under the contract of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,941 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment calculated as 7.5 weeks at £545 per week, based on age 50 and 5 complete years' service. | Upheld | — | £4,088 |
| Holiday pay | Award for 8 days' accrued but untaken annual leave. | Upheld | — | £717 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,462
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.