Case 4101923/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H McGrehan v Indemnis Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101923/2023
- Decision date
- 28 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H McGrehan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a statutory redundancy payment of £2,855, notice pay of £3,091.85, outstanding holiday pay of £494.68, and outstanding wages of £742.02.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. For that claim, it awarded £742.02 for loss of wages and £500 for loss of statutory rights.
The judgment is a short remedies judgment and does not set out fuller reasoning or identify any additional legal tests applied.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Outstanding holiday pay awarded at £123.67 x 4 days. | Upheld | — | £495 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Outstanding wages awarded at £123.67 x 6 days. | Upheld | — | £742 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded at £571 x 5 weeks. | Upheld | — | £2,855 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded at £618.37 x 5 weeks. | Upheld | — | £3,092 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal awarded £742.02 for loss of wages and £500 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £1,242 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,426
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,242
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.