Ms L McGrehan v Indemnis Limited — 2023

Case reference: 4101934/2023
Decision date: 28 December 2023
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge F Eccles

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms L McGrehan

Respondent

Indemnis Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a statutory redundancy payment of £3,140.50, notice pay of £9,306.96, outstanding holiday pay of £2,481.92, and outstanding wages of £930.69.

The tribunal also found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. It awarded £9,966.56 for loss of wages and a further £500 for loss of statutory rights. The judgment gives the outcome and remedy figures but does not set out detailed reasons or legal analysis in the extracted text.

Claims and outcomes

5 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Redundancy	Recorded from the judgment.	Upheld	—	£3,141
Breach of contract	The judgment awards 'notice pay' without expressly naming the legal basis. Classified as breach of contract with moderate confidence.	Upheld	—	£9,307
Holiday pay	Recorded from the judgment.	Upheld	—	£2,482
Unlawful deduction from wages	Recorded from the judgment.	Upheld	—	£931
Unfair dismissal	The unfair dismissal remedy is stated as £9,966.56 for loss of wages plus £500 for loss of statutory rights.	Upheld	—	£10,467

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £26,327; across all upheld claims
Compensatory award: £10,467; compensatory remedy recorded

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.