Case 4101963/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N McGavin v Indemnis Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101963/2023
- Decision date
- 28 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N McGavin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a statutory redundancy payment of £3,184.62, calculated as £571 for 6 weeks.
The tribunal also ordered payment of £2,123.06 in notice pay, calculated as £530.77 for 4 weeks, and £636.90 in outstanding wages, calculated as £106.15 for 6 days. The extracted text records the wages figure as '£636.9020', but the calculation stated in the judgment yields £636.90.
The tribunal further ordered payment of £530.75 in outstanding holiday pay, calculated as £106.15 for 5 days. The judgment is a short disposal judgment and does not set out further reasons or legal analysis.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,185 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was awarded as 4 weeks' pay. The judgment does not expressly label the legal basis beyond ordering payment of notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,123 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted text shows '£636.9020', but the arithmetic given in the judgment (£106.15 x 6 days) indicates £636.90. | Upheld | — | £637 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £531 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,475
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.