Case 4102064/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102064/2017 Mr D Simpson v North Ayrshire Council — 2018
- Case reference
- 4102064/2017
- Decision date
- 26 March 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Garvie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102064/2017 Mr D Simpson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr D Simpson brought a claim against North Ayrshire Council. The judgment text does not set out factual allegations, evidence, or substantive findings on the merits.
The tribunal recorded that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The gov.uk listing category indicates disability discrimination, but the judgment text itself only says the claim was withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. The protected characteristic is inferred from the listing context rather than stated in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.