Case 4102240/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 4102240/2015 Mr M Jackson v City Building (Glasgow) LLP — 2024
- Case reference
- 4102240/2015
- Decision date
- 27 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 4102240/2015 Mr M Jackson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued, specifically in terms of rule 38(1)(d).
The Tribunal recorded that on 11 December 2024 the claimant was given until 27 December 2024 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing on that issue. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing, so the Tribunal struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action, stating only that the claim is struck out under rule 38 for not being actively pursued. The gov.uk listing categories refer to unlawful deduction from wages and working time, but those claim types are not stated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.