Case 4102250/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102250/2017 Mr P Moody v Doosan Babcock Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4102250/2017
- Decision date
- 29 March 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102250/2017 Mr P Moody
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr P Moody's claim against Doosan Babcock Ltd had been withdrawn by the claimant. Following that withdrawal, Employment Judge Doherty dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings on the merits of the claim are recorded. The judgment does not record any remedy award, compensation figure, costs order, or other monetary outcome.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52; the unfair dismissal classification comes from the supplied listing category rather than the judgment text itself. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.