Case 4102271/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge, L Wiseman Case Number: 4102271/2015 Mr J Monaghan v City Building (Glasgow) LLP — 2025
- Case reference
- 4102271/2015
- Decision date
- 27 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge, L Wiseman Case Number: 4102271/2015 Mr J Monaghan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024, on the ground that the claim had not been actively pursued in terms of rule 38(1)(d).
The reasons recorded were that correspondence sent to the claimant at the address provided had been returned marked 'gone away', no new address had been provided, and the claimant's previous agents had withdrawn from acting and held no other address for him. In those circumstances, the tribunal found that the claim was not being actively pursued and struck it out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive legal claim beyond striking out 'the claim' under rule 38 because it was not being actively pursued. The gov.uk listing categories indicate unlawful deduction from wages and working time, but those are not adjudicated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024
- rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.