Case 4102294/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge, L Wiseman Case Number: 4102294/2015 Ms D Roseman v City Building (Glasgow) LLP — 2025
- Case reference
- 4102294/2015
- Decision date
- 27 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge, L Wiseman Case Number: 4102294/2015 Ms D Roseman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant's solicitors had withdrawn, and correspondence sent to the claimant on 29 November 2024 was returned because she no longer resided at the address provided on the ET1. The claimant had not provided a new address, leaving the tribunal unable to communicate with her or give notice under rule 38(2). The tribunal assumed she no longer wished to pursue the claim and struck it out under rule 38(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim for not being actively pursued, but the extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 38(2) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.