Case 4102636/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102636/2019 Mr P Jones v Canon UK Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102636/2019
- Decision date
- 10 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Porter Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102636/2019 Mr P Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr P Jones brought a claim against Canon UK Ltd. It does not set out any substantive liability findings or a remedy hearing outcome.
The only operative finding is procedural: the tribunal states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and is dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No further reasons, factual findings, or legal analysis are given in the extracted text.
On that basis, the record reflects a withdrawn claim that was formally dismissed by the tribunal, with no monetary award recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.