Case 4102660/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A S Blue v Represented by: Mr S Smith - Solicitor Irvine’s Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4102660/2020
- Decision date
- 5 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Sorrell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A S Blue
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs A S Blue worked for Irvine’s Ltd as a Bakery Counter Assistant from 1 March 2006 until 19 March 2020. She had already presented a constructive unfair dismissal claim. At a telephone preliminary hearing on 29 September 2020, the tribunal considered her application made on 7 August 2020 to amend the claim to add direct disability discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010 and harassment related to disability under s.26 Equality Act 2010. The proposed claims were said to arise from Achilles tendonitis, the 19 March 2020 telephone call with Mr Maurice Irvine, and the email correspondence of 12 and 14 April 2020.
Applying Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore, the tribunal refused the amendment. It held that the proposed Equality Act complaints were new causes of action rather than a relabelling of the constructive dismissal claim, that they lacked sufficient specification, and that the amendment application was out of time by two days after the ACAS-adjusted time limit. The tribunal was not satisfied that there were exceptional reasons to extend time under s.123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010. It also held that allowing the amendment would require fresh factual and legal enquiries, including whether the claimant was disabled, and would likely require further disclosure and witness evidence, causing greater prejudice to the respondent. The claimant’s existing constructive unfair dismissal claim remained live, and the tribunal made no substantive merits finding or remedy on the proposed Equality Act claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Proposed amendment to add a direct disability discrimination claim under s.13 Equality Act 2010 was refused at the preliminary hearing; the tribunal did not determine the merits or whether Achilles tendonitis amounted to a disability. | Other | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Proposed amendment to add harassment related to disability under s.26 Equality Act 2010 was refused; the tribunal did not determine the merits of the alleged 19 March, 12 April and 14 April 2020 conduct. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore
- s.123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable extension of time
- Abercrombie v Aga Rangemaster Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.