Case 4102660/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant Mr T Innes Represented by Mr N Patterson - Solicitor v Ms M Bergen Represented by Mr N Patterson - Solicitor Forth Valley College of Further and Higher Education — 2024
- Case reference
- 4102660/2024
- Decision date
- 20 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sutherland First
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant Mr T Innes Represented by Mr N Patterson - Solicitor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimants brought complaints under the Part-time Workers Regulations 2000 about entitlement to paid leave for three winter closure days in January 2023. They said part-time staff were treated less favourably than comparable full-time workers because the closure days were not pro-rated, and they argued in the alternative that the complaints were in time because the treatment was a less favourable contractual term or because time should be extended on a just and equitable basis.
The tribunal found that paid leave for the three winter closure days was not a contractual term implied by custom and practice. Although the practice had existed for around 10 years and was well known, it was not certain, because the respondent had on a number of occasions told staff that the closure days were discretionary, there was no contractual entitlement, and staff could be required to work during a closure. On that basis, Regulation 8(4)(a) did not assist the claimants.
The tribunal also held that the complaints were not in time under the alternative time-limit arguments. It noted that the respondent's failure to pay for the closure days in January 2023 was an inconsistent act for the purposes of Regulation 8(5)(a), so the relevant act occurred then. The tribunal then rejected a just and equitable extension of time, taking into account that the claimants were union members, knew the relevant factual position by January 2023, the union had raised the issue in 2022 and early 2023, and ACAS Early Conciliation was not started until 28 November 2023 with claims lodged on 13 February 2024. The claims were therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part-time worker regulations | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal held that both claimants' complaints were presented outwith the statutory time limit and dismissed them for want of jurisdiction; the merits were not determined. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- Regulation 8(2) Part-time Workers Regulations 2000
- Regulation 8(4)(a) Part-time Workers Regulations 2000
- Regulation 8(5)(a) Part-time Workers Regulations 2000
- just and equitable extension of time
- Albion Automotive Ltd v Walker
- Bond v Cav Ltd
- Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan
- Kumari v Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.