Case 4102693/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 4102693/2020; 4102694/2020; 4102695/2020; 4102696/2020; 4102697/2020; 4102698/2020 and 4102699/2020 Ms J McFadyen v Clarity Products Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4102693/2020
- Decision date
- 3 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Gall Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 4102693/2020; 4102694/2020; 4102695/2020; 4102696/2020; 4102697/2020; 4102698/2020 and 4102699/2020 Ms J McFadyen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. An Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorized deduction from each claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the listed net sums to the six named claimants.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found unauthorized deductions from each claimant's wages and ordered net payments of £1,471.44, £978, £975, £978, £530, and £535. The remedy amount is the aggregate of those listed sums. | Upheld | — | £5,467 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,467
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.