Case 4102794/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102794/2020 Ms S Connelly v HC-One Oval Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102794/2020
- Decision date
- 20 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O'Donnell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102794/2020 Ms S Connelly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs S Connelly's claim against HC-One Oval Limited was struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because it had not been actively pursued. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's representative wrote on 17 December 2020 saying the claim was continuing and that a schedule of loss and other documents would be submitted, but nothing was lodged.
The tribunal later wrote on 11 June 2021 seeking an update and sent a reminder on 12 July 2021, but no reply was received. On 2 August 2021 it gave the claimant until 16 August 2021 to provide written reasons or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. No acceptable reason was provided and no hearing was requested, so the tribunal struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment does not restate the underlying substantive complaint, but the case listing identifies the matter as an unlawful deduction from wages claim. The tribunal struck the claim out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.