E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 4102910/2023, 4102911/23, 4102912/23, 4102913/23, 4102914/23 and 4102957/23,5 Held at Inverness on & October 2023 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr. M Chalmers (4102910/23) st v Represented by: Mr. M Briggs, Advocate Instructed by: Ms N Wylie, Solicitor & Ms A Cowie, Solicitor Wyvis One Estate Limited st and 3 others — Employment Tribunal 2023

Loading…

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Whistleblowing	The tribunal accepted the Further and Better Particulars only in part: the first eight alleged protected disclosures were treated as identifiable from the ET1, but disclosures 9-20 were not accepted because they were insufficiently particularised. This was a case-management ruling, not a merits determination.	Other	—	—
Harassment	The harassment claim brought by Mr Gordon Beattie and Mrs Marie Beattie was dismissed as out of time, and the tribunal declined to extend time on a just and equitable basis.	Dismissed	Age	—
Victimisation	The victimisation claim brought by Mr Gordon Beattie and Mrs Marie Beattie was dismissed as out of time, and the tribunal declined to extend time on a just and equitable basis.	Dismissed	Age	—

E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 4102910/2023, 4102911/23, 4102912/23, 4102913/23, 4102914/23 and 4102957/23,5 Held at Inverness on & October 2023 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr. M Chalmers (4102910/23) st v Represented by: Mr. M Briggs, Advocate Instructed by: Ms N Wylie, Solicitor & Ms A Cowie, Solicitor Wyvis One Estate Limited st and 3 others — Employment Tribunal 2023 | Tribunal Watch

Parties

Claimant

Respondents

Key findings

Claims and outcomes

Legal tests applied

Official outcome judgment PDF

How we got this data