Case 4102928/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102928/2020 Mr A Malavain v Cordia (Services) LLP — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102928/2020
- Decision date
- 22 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102928/2020 Mr A Malavain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 22 September 2022, Employment Judge Frances Eccles struck out Mr A Malavain’s claim against Cordia (Services) LLP, Glasgow City Council, and Culture And Sport Glasgow (trading) C.i.c. The judgment records that the strike-out was made under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
The tribunal had previously given the claimant until 16 September 2022 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing for that purpose. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing, so the tribunal decided to strike out the claim. No substantive liability findings or monetary remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive legal basis of the claim in the reasons section; it only states that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.