Case 4102932/2023 · Employment Tribunal
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102932/2023 Mr M Riley v Busi-Box Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4102932/2023
- Decision date
- 11 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102932/2023 Mr M Riley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented. Employment Judge I McFatridge decided the claim without a hearing on the basis of the papers. The judgment records that the respondent failed to give the claimant the notice to which he was entitled. The tribunal awarded £520, described as one week's pay, as damages for breach of contract.
The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £312, calculated as 40 hours at £13.00 per hour, in respect of holiday accrued but untaken as at the date of termination of employment. The hearing listed for 14 August 2023 was cancelled. The total award recorded by the judgment is £832.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent failed to give the claimant the notice to which he was entitled and awarded £520, described as one week's pay, as damages for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £520 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £312 for 40 hours at £13.00 per hour in respect of holiday accrued but untaken at termination. | Upheld | — | £312 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £832
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.