Case 4102937/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Member Ms M McAllister Tribunal Member Mr R McPherson Ms M Coulter v Scottish Police Authority — 2024
- Case reference
- 4102937/2023
- Decision date
- 20 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Mackay Tribunal
- Venue
- Glasgow
- Panel members
- Ms M McAllister, Mr R McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Member Ms M McAllister Tribunal Member Mr R McPherson Ms M Coulter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a discrimination claim on grounds of sexual orientation under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010. The claimant alleged that she had been treated less favourably by being subjected to informal disciplinary action and moved to a different team after issues were raised about communications to a colleague.
The final hearing was listed for 15 to 18 January 2024. On the first day the claimant did not attend after emailing the Tribunal to say she was cold and asked for the case to be postponed. The tribunal declined the respondent's application to dismiss for non-attendance, criticised the claimant's decision not to attend, and directed her to attend the following day.
When the hearing resumed, the claimant objected to the presence of the sister of the respondent's first witness, who wished to attend the public hearing for moral support. The tribunal explained that the hearing was public and that the sister was entitled to attend, refused the claimant's postponement request, and then recorded the claimant's repeated refusal to proceed unless the sister left the room. Applying rule 37(1)(b) and (e), and referring to Hasan v Tesco Stores Limited, De Keyser Ltd v Wilson, Bolch v Chipman and Leslie v Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, the tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant's conduct was unreasonable and it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing.
Because the claim was struck out before any substantive evidence was heard, the tribunal made no findings on the underlying discrimination allegations. It also refused the claimant's request for anonymity, stating that there was no evidential basis for such an order and that open justice applied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Claim under section 13 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal struck it out during the hearing under rule 37(1)(b) and (e) after the claimant refused to continue participating. No merits findings were made. | Struck out | Sexual orientation | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- rule 37(1)(b) and (e)
- rule 47
- Hasan v Tesco Stores Limited
- De Keyser Ltd v Wilson
- Bolch v Chipman
- Leslie v Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.