Case 4103001/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Suarez v Advocate General for Scotland — 2022
- Case reference
- 4103001/2019
- Decision date
- 6 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Suarez
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 9 March 2022 the respondent applied for the claimant’s claim to be struck out. The tribunal wrote to the claimant on 10 March 2022 inviting comments on the application, with a reply sought by 17 March 2022, but no response was received.
The tribunal then gave the claimant a further opportunity on 21 March 2022 to provide written reasons by 4 April 2022, or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. No reply was received. The tribunal found that the claimant had failed to give an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made and struck out the claim under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not identify any substantive liability finding before strike-out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d) ET Rules 2013
- not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.