Case 4103123/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Sam Cumming v Mills Milk — 2023
- Case reference
- 4103123/2023
- Decision date
- 16 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sutherland
- Venue
- Inverness
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Sam Cumming
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not enter a response and did not appear. The claimant, Mr Sam Cumming, gave evidence in person and the tribunal found him to be entirely credible and reliable, though his evidence was not tested in cross-examination. He had been employed by Mills Milk from 1 March 2023 to 21 April 2023, delivering milk four nights a week for £100 gross per night, with payment made fortnightly in arrears. He did not take any holidays during the employment, and weekly deductions of £16 for employee pension contributions were made despite his having opted out of auto-enrolment timeously.
The tribunal accepted the claimant’s unlawful deduction from wages complaints. It found that, as at termination, he had accrued 0.81 weeks of annual leave and was due 3.3 days of holiday, with the fraction less than a half treated as a half. On that basis, and using a daily rate of £100, it awarded £350 gross holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had not been paid wages due after 7 April 2023 and awarded £800 gross for arrears of wages, calculated as two unpaid periods of £400 each. It further ordered repayment of £80 gross for pension deductions, reflecting £16 per week over five weeks. The claimant had also raised a minimum wage concern during the hearing, but he said he did not seek to amend his claim and would raise that matter with HMRC instead.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Awarded under the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal calculated 3.5 days of holiday pay at £100 per day. | Upheld | — | £350 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award for unpaid wages. The judgment records the unpaid period as work undertaken in weeks ending 14 April and 21 May; that date reference appears internally inconsistent with the April termination date, so it is extracted as written. | Upheld | — | £800 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Repayment of employee pension contributions deducted after the claimant had opted out of auto-enrolment timeously. | Upheld | — | £80 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,230
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- balance of probabilities
- section 13 ERA 1996
- section 13(3) ERA 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.