Case 4103136/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Shirley Douglas v Hometrust Care Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103136/2019
- Decision date
- 25 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge
- Venue
- Dundee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Shirley Douglas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt this preliminary hearing, Ms Shirley Douglas said she was disabled from about June 2018 because of stress, anxiety and related symptoms arising from her separation, divorce proceedings, criminal proceedings involving allegations about her child, and an earlier breast-lump scare. The tribunal accepted that she had experienced symptoms such as racing heartbeat, vibrating sensations, difficulty concentrating, and periods when she found supermarket shopping or returning home alone at night difficult, and it accepted that she had been prescribed Sertraline and Diazepam and had seen her GP regularly.
The tribunal nevertheless found that the contemporary medical records did not show a formal diagnosis of depression or anxiety. It treated the fit notes as referring to stress or marital breakdown, and gave little weight to the later GP letter of 24 June 2019 because the earlier records did not support a change from stress to an underlying impairment. Applying section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 and the Schedule 1 guidance, it held that the evidence showed a stress reaction to adverse personal circumstances rather than a proved physical or mental impairment.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had not shown a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities. It noted that she lived alone but maintained an active social life, was able to work until June 2018, could sometimes shop for herself, and had not given sufficiently specific evidence of substantial functional limitation. In the alternative, even if there had been an impairment, the tribunal held that it was not shown to be long term by January 2019 because her own case was that the condition began in June 2018 and the evidence suggested it was tied to the progress and outcome of her divorce proceedings. The disability discrimination claim was therefore dismissed; the unfair dismissal, notice pay and holiday pay claims were not determined at this hearing and were left for listing to a final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | This was a preliminary hearing on disability only. The tribunal held that the claimant was not disabled at the relevant time, so the disability discrimination claim could not proceed. The unfair dismissal, notice pay and holiday pay claims were left for a later hearing. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 2 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 5 Equality Act 2010
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP [2010] IRLR 936 EAT
- Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Morris UKEAT/0436/10
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.