Case 4103360/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103360/2019 Mr J Hardie v FMS Scotland Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103360/2019
- Decision date
- 4 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sally Cowen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103360/2019 Mr J Hardie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge Sally Cowen issued judgment under rule 21 on the available material. The hearing listed for 5 July 2019 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,090. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £9,012.
The tribunal further found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £8,890. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £693. The awards together total £19,685.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,090 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages of £9,012. | Upheld | — | £9,012 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £8,890. | Upheld | — | £8,890 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awards £693. | Upheld | — | £693 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,685
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.