Case 4103769/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Glen v Hotel in the Skye Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4103769/2020
- Decision date
- 17 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Glen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal amended the respondent’s name to add the word “Limited”. It then recorded that Mr Glen did not have two years’ continuous employment with Hotel in the Skye Limited, and the unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.
The separate breach of contract claim succeeded. The Tribunal held that the respondent failed to pay money in lieu of contractual notice and ordered the respondent to pay Mr Glen £7,263 in compensation. No other remedy components were set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal found that the claimant did not have two years’ continuous employment with the respondent. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal found that the respondent breached the contract of employment by failing to pay money in lieu of contractual notice and ordered compensation of £7,263. | Upheld | — | £7,263 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,263
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.