Case 4104053/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Gilbride v Forresters Arms — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104053/2018
- Decision date
- 7 June 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Claire McManus
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Gilbride
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss P Gilbride, brought a complaint of unpaid wages against The Forresters Arms. The respondent was sent the claim form on 19 April 2018 but did not enter a response within the time required by the Rules of Procedure 2013.
Proceeding under Rule 21, Employment Judge Claire McManus determined liability on the available material without a hearing. The tribunal upheld the complaint of unpaid wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £206.50.
For remedy, the tribunal calculated the award at the gross rate of £5.90 per hour for work done in five identified periods: Friday 2 March, Saturday 3 March, Sunday 4 March, Tuesday 6 March, and Thursday 8 March 2018. The amounts listed for those shifts totalled £206.50, which was the sum awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal treated the complaint as unpaid wages and awarded the full sum claimed after the respondent failed to enter a response. | Upheld | — | £207 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £207
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.