Case 4104256/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Case Number: 4104256/2022 Mr S Cusack v Glasgow City Council Glasgow Life — 2025
- Case reference
- 4104256/2022
- Decision date
- 18 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Case Number: 4104256/2022 Mr S Cusack
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 25 February 2025, the Tribunal gave Mr S Cusack an opportunity to provide written reasons by 11 March 2025, or to request a hearing, on the question whether the claim should be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason why strike out should not be ordered and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 38(1)(d). The judgment does not determine the underlying merits of the claim and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it had not been actively pursued. On 25 February 2025 the claimant was given until 11 March 2025 to provide written reasons or request a hearing, but he did not provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 38 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.