Case 4104321/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Morris v OCS Group UK Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4104321/2023
- Decision date
- 23 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Morris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 20 September 2023 seeking additional information about the claims being made. The claimant did not provide the information requested, and the Tribunal sent reminders and further copies or details of the questions on 11 October, 16 October, and 20 October 2023.
The respondent applied on 27 October 2023 for the claim to be struck out under rule 37(a), or for an unless order. The Tribunal sought the claimant's comments and gave him until 10 November 2023 to provide written reasons or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing category identifies the case as Working Time Regulations, but the judgment itself does not describe the substantive claim beyond referring to 'the claims being made'. The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.