Case 4104557/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Members: Mr S. Currie Mrs J. Smillie Mrs P. Ahsan v Represented by: Ms K. Bolt, Solicitor Asda Stores Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4104557/2022
- Decision date
- 26 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B. Beyzade Tribunal
- Panel members
- Mr S. Currie, Mrs J. Smillie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Members: Mr S. Currie Mrs J. Smillie Mrs P. Ahsan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing held by CVP on 22 September 2023, the tribunal recorded that the claimant’s complaints of direct race discrimination, indirect race discrimination, and harassment related to race had been withdrawn by the claimant. The judgment states that those complaints were dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Oral reasons were given at the hearing. The written record does not contain any substantive merits findings, remedy assessment, or separate factual conclusions on the withdrawn complaints. The judgment is dated 26 September 2023 and records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination complaint was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Indirect race discrimination complaint was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to race was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.