Case 4104585/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Lorraine Comrie v F Pubs Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4104585/2020
- Decision date
- 19 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R King
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Lorraine Comrie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Lorraine Comrie worked for F5 Pubs Limited at the Kirkhouse Bar and Kitchen from 1 April 2018 to 14 July 2020 as bar staff, working 18 hours per week at £8.21 per hour. On 11 July 2020, when the premises reopened after lockdown, she made a tilling error on a sale to customer A and separately put £4 from customer B into the tip jar after customer B took two face masks. On 13 and 14 July, the bar manager told her the respondent believed CCTV showed she had charged customer A for two pints but recorded one, and then dismissed her on 14 July 2020 for alleged theft of £4.
The tribunal accepted the claimant as a credible and reliable witness. Because the respondent did not attend, lodge a response or produce evidence, the tribunal found there had been no reasonable investigation, no disclosure of the alleged CCTV, no disciplinary hearing, no dismissal letter and no appeal process. Applying BHS v Burchell, s.98(4) ERA 1996 and the range of reasonable responses in Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones, it held the respondent did not have a genuine belief on reasonable grounds and that the dismissal was substantively and procedurally unfair.
The unfair dismissal claim was upheld and the tribunal awarded a basic award of £443.34. It also awarded £1,921.14 for loss of earnings, £250 for loss of statutory rights and a 25% uplift of £480.29 because the respondent unreasonably failed to follow the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The holiday pay claim was also upheld: the tribunal found the claimant had never been given an effective opportunity to take paid holidays because she had to work an alternative day when taking leave, and awarded £246.45 for 2020/2021, £591.12 for 2019/2020 and £591.12 for 2018/2019, totalling £1,428.69. The judgment states a total award of £4,523.36, although the itemised figures otherwise sum to £4,523.46.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal was for alleged misconduct after the respondent accused the claimant of stealing £4. The award comprised a basic award of £443.34, compensatory elements of £1,921.14 for loss of earnings and £250 for loss of statutory rights, and a 25% ACAS uplift of £480.29. | Upheld | — | £3,095 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held the claimant had not had an effective opportunity to take paid leave during employment and was entitled to accrued but unused holiday pay on termination. The award was £246.45 for 2020/2021, £591.12 for 2019/2020 and £591.12 for 2018/2019. | Upheld | — | £1,429 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,523
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £443
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,171
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
6 references- BHS v Burchell
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones
- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Kreuziger v Berlin (C-619/16)
- section 207A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.