Case 4104604/2020 · Employment Tribunal
(sitting alone) Mr Leonard Mowles v DHL Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4104604/2020
- Decision date
- 30 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Neil Buzzard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(sitting alone) Mr Leonard Mowles
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims of unfair dismissal and for a redundancy payment against DHL Services Limited. The hearing took place by Cloud Video Platform on 27 and 28 January 2021 before Employment Judge Buzzard sitting alone.
The tribunal dismissed both claims, stating that the claims of unfair dismissal and for a redundancy payment were not well founded. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's claim of unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. Oral reasons were given; no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for a redundancy payment was not well founded and was dismissed. Oral reasons were given; no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.