Case 4104612/2016 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104612/2016 Mr I Peacock v Dumfries and Galloway Health Board — 2017
- Case reference
- 4104612/2016
- Decision date
- 2 March 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104612/2016 Mr I Peacock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only decision recorded is procedural. The claimant withdrew the claim, and Employment Judge Laura Doherty dismissed it under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on 2 March 2017. The extracted judgment does not set out any findings on the merits of the dispute.
No remedy was awarded or quantified in the judgment text provided. The record states only that the claim was dismissed following withdrawal, and gives the date of judgment and registration. No panel members are listed, and no legal test beyond Rule 52 is mentioned in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that 'the claim' was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. It does not specify the underlying cause of action in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.