Case 4104727/2022 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104727/2022 (V)5 Held at Aberdeen on November 2022 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr C Pirie v Croft and Cairns — 2022
- Case reference
- 4104727/2022
- Decision date
- 9 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104727/2022 (V)5 Held at Aberdeen on November 2022 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr C Pirie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal at Aberdeen, with Employment Judge J M Hendry sitting alone, recorded that the claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not appear or was not represented. For the reasons given orally at the hearing, the tribunal found the claimant's claims were well-founded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent company to pay a redundancy payment of £1,995, calculated by reference to the claimant's length of service and gross pay. It also ordered payment of £65.15 for three months' accrued holiday pay outstanding at the date of redundancy.
A further award of £190 was made for one week's pay in lieu of notice. The judgment does not identify any discrimination issues, legal tests, or separate interest calculation, and the total sums ordered come to £2,250.15.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Awarded as a redundancy payment calculated with regard to the claimant's length of service and gross pay. | Upheld | — | £1,995 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for three months' accrued holiday pay outstanding at the date of redundancy. | Upheld | — | £65 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as one week's pay in lieu of notice. | Upheld | — | £190 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.