Case 4105280/2016 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4105280/2016 Mr D Clark v Stork Technical Services (RBG) Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 4105280/2016
- Decision date
- 25 April 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4105280/2016 Mr D Clark
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records only that the claim brought by Mr D Clark against Stork Technical Services (RBG) Limited was withdrawn by the claimant. The tribunal therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No findings were made on the merits and no monetary award was recorded. The decision was signed by Employment Judge Nicol on 25 April 2017.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. The extracted text does not identify the underlying claim type(s). | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.