Case 4105320/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Frame v Care UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4105320/2023
- Decision date
- 16 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Frame
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the claimant’s name to Mrs H Frame and recorded that the respondent was not present and not represented. It then held that the respondent had unlawfully deducted sums from the claimant’s wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and ordered payment of £4,693 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay £2,468 as compensation for accrued but untaken annual paid leave under regulation 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The extracted judgment records these outcomes and monetary awards, but does not set out any further factual findings or detailed reasoning in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent unlawfully deducted sums from the claimant’s wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £4,693 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded compensation for accrued but untaken annual paid leave under regulation 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £2,468 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,161
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £7,161
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- Section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 16 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.