Case 4105390/2020 · Employment Tribunal
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 4105390/2020; 4105391/2020 & 4105392/2020 Mr A McGowan v Hamilton Academical Football Club Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4105390/2020
- Decision date
- 27 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peter O'Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 4105390/2020; 4105391/2020 & 4105392/2020 Mr A McGowan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 default judgment after no response was presented within the time limit under Rule 16, and no Rule 20 application to extend time was made. The tribunal recorded that the respondent was therefore not entitled to participate in the proceedings and proceeded on the material available.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlements. For case 4105390/2020, Aaron McGowan, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,188.88.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 default judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay Aaron McGowan's holiday entitlements and ordered payment of £1,188.88 for this case. | Upheld | — | £1,189 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,189
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.