Case 4105451/2022 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105451/2022 (V)5 Held at Aberdeen on December 2022 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr R Fraser v Handmade Burger Company Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4105451/2022
- Decision date
- 20 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105451/2022 (V)5 Held at Aberdeen on December 2022 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr R Fraser
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Fraser was employed by the respondent as a chef from October 2021 until his summary dismissal on 26 July 2022. The tribunal also changed the respondent name from Aspirational Brands Ltd to Handmade Burger Co. Ltd / Handmade Burger Company Limited after the respondent’s representative explained which entity employed the claimant.
The tribunal accepted the claimant’s evidence as accurate and reliable, and noted that the sums claimed were not disputed. It found that deductions totalling £120 had been made from wages for pension contributions, but those deductions had not been paid to the pension provider, so the claim under s.23 of the Employment Rights Act was well-founded.
The tribunal further found that the respondent’s letter of 5 July 2022 acknowledged that £1,273.13 was due as notice pay and £548.42 was due as accrued holiday pay. The claimant accepted those sums were due, and the tribunal ordered payment of both amounts as damages for breach of contract and as payment in lieu of accrued holiday pay. The combined award was £1,941.55.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found deductions totalling £120 for pension had been made from wages but not paid to the pension provider. | Upheld | — | £120 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded notice pay of £1,273.13, which the respondent had identified in its 5 July 2022 letter but had not paid. | Upheld | — | £1,273 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded £548.42 for accrued holiday pay, which the respondent had identified in its 5 July 2022 letter but had not paid. | Upheld | — | £548 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,942
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.