Case 4105482/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J McFadyen v Clarity Products Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4105482/2020
- Decision date
- 10 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J McFadyen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. Employment Judge Susan Walker issued judgment on the available material under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment and ordered the respondent to pay £10,801.70. It also found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,703.34, made up of furlough salary, salary top-up and holiday pay components.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claimant was found entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £10,802 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found an unauthorised deduction from wages. This amount reflects the furlough salary and salary top-up components only. | Upheld | — | £748 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment included holiday pay as a component of the unauthorised deduction from wages award. | Upheld | — | £956 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,505
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.