Case 4105549/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105549/2024 A Dornan v Glasgow East Women’s Aid (in Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 4105549/2024
- Decision date
- 6 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105549/2024 A Dornan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued a rule 21 judgment on the available material. The judgment records that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and the first respondent was ordered to pay damages of £4,086.98.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £21,000. As the claimant had already received £14,295.03 from the Redundancy Payments Service, the first respondent was ordered to pay the remaining £6,704.97.
In addition, the tribunal found that the first respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £446.54. The judgment does not record any separate award of interest or other remedy beyond these sums.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £4,087 |
| Redundancy | Dismissed by reason of redundancy and found entitled to a redundancy payment of £21,000. The claimant had already received £14,295.03 from the Redundancy Payments Service, so the first respondent was ordered to pay the balance. | Upheld | — | £6,705 |
| Holiday pay | The first respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay the sum stated. | Upheld | — | £447 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,238
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.