Case 4105553/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105553/2024 Mrs L Benson v Glasgow East Women’s Aid (in Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 4105553/2024
- Decision date
- 6 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105553/2024 Mrs L Benson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a rule 21 judgment after no response was presented to the claim. On the available material, it found that Glasgow East Women’s Aid (in Liquidation) had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs L Benson’s wages and ordered payment of £197.87. It also found that she was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,207.04 in damages.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,310.41. As the judgment records that she had already received £3,877.05 from the Redundancy Payments Service, the first respondent was ordered to pay the balance of £1,433.36. The tribunal also found that the first respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £558.99. No other legal tests or reasoning were set out in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £198 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages for notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,207 |
| Redundancy | The judgment records entitlement to a redundancy payment of £5,310.41, with £3,877.05 already paid by the Redundancy Payments Service; the first respondent was ordered to pay the remaining £1,433.36. | Upheld | — | £1,433 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the first respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £559 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,397
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.