Case 4105557/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105557/2024 Mrs C Elliott v Glasgow East Women’s Aid (in Liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 4105557/2024
- Decision date
- 30 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105557/2024 Mrs C Elliott
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, the Employment Judge found that the first respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £25.90.
The Employment Judge also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The first respondent was ordered to pay damages of £2,065.08 for that breach of contract claim.
The judgment further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £10,816.38. Because the claimant had already received £7,718.76 from the Redundancy Payments Service, the first respondent was ordered to pay the remaining £3,097.62.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the first respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and was ordered to pay £25.90. | Upheld | — | £26 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,065.08 damages. | Upheld | — | £2,065 |
| Redundancy | The judgment records redundancy payment entitlement of £10,816.38, a £7,718.76 payment from the Redundancy Payments Service, and an order that the first respondent pay the remaining £3,097.62. | Upheld | — | £3,098 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,189
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.