Case 4105559/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105559/2024 Ms H Carrigan v Glasgow East Women’s Aid (in Liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 4105559/2024
- Decision date
- 27 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105559/2024 Ms H Carrigan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, the Employment Judge found that Ms H Carrigan had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered Glasgow East Women’s Aid (in Liquidation), as the first respondent, to pay damages of £486.69.
The Employment Judge also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,699.80. The judgment records that the claimant had received £1,213.11 from the Redundancy Payments Service, leaving £486.69 outstanding, which the first respondent was ordered to pay. The total of the two sums ordered against the first respondent is £973.38.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and orders the first respondent to pay damages of £486.69. | Upheld | — | £487 |
| Redundancy | The judgment records entitlement to a redundancy payment of £1,699.80, receipt of £1,213.11 from the Redundancy Payments Service, and an order that the first respondent pay the remaining £486.69. | Upheld | — | £487 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £973
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.