Case 4105622/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105622/2015 Mrs K McLellan v Scottish Autism — 2019
- Case reference
- 4105622/2015
- Decision date
- 16 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105622/2015 Mrs K McLellan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis one-page judgment contains no merits findings. Employment Judge Robert Gall recorded that Mrs K McLellan's claim against Scottish Autism had been withdrawn by the claimant and was therefore dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The decision was dated 16 July 2019 and entered in the register the same day.
No liability findings, remedy assessment, or compensation figures are recorded. The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action in its own text, and it does not list any hearing evidence or reasons beyond the withdrawal and dismissal order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type. It records that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The gov.uk listing categorises the case under Working Time Regulations, but that is not stated in the judgment text itself. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.