Case 4105805/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105805/2022 Miss K Stefanko v Hotel in the Skye Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4105805/2022
- Decision date
- 9 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105805/2022 Miss K Stefanko
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. Employment Judge M Whitcombe therefore issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £599.14. It also found that the claimant had been denied other payments, described in the judgment as tips, in breach of contract, and ordered damages of £306.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £678.95. The hearing listed for 10 February 2023 was cancelled. The judgment records no separate interest award or other remedy beyond the three sums ordered.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this head as failure to pay holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £679 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £599 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this head as denial of other payments, identified as tips, in breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £306 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,584
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.