Case 4106053/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Theresa Abraham v Represented by: Mr S Wilson Solicitor Westguard Security Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4106053/2017
- Decision date
- 15 May 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Theresa Abraham
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Theresa Abraham alleged sexual harassment by Mr Steven McMahon and unfair dismissal by Westguard Security Ltd. This judgment was a preliminary hearing on time bar only. The tribunal accepted that the last act relied on for the harassment claim was her resignation on 8 July 2017, and that the claim presented on 15 November 2017 was late on its face by about five weeks. It also treated the unfair dismissal complaint as out of time unless an extension could be granted.
For the Equality Act claim, the tribunal applied section 123 and considered whether it would be just and equitable to extend time. It accepted the claimant's evidence that she was significantly distressed, embarrassed, and struggling to put events into writing, and gave weight to the GP's evidence that she was significantly distressed in May and December 2017 and may have been clinically depressed throughout the intervening period. The tribunal also noted that documentary material such as text messages, photographs, and the respondent's investigation meant the cogency of the evidence would not be materially affected by the delay, and that the balance of prejudice favoured the claimant.
For the unfair dismissal complaint, the tribunal considered section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and concluded that, in light of the GP evidence, the claimant's difficulty writing the claim, and her embarrassment about recounting the events, it was not reasonably practicable for the complaint to be presented in time. It was satisfied that the claim had been brought within such further period as was reasonable. The tribunal therefore decided that both claims were not time-barred and could proceed to a final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Preliminary hearing only: the tribunal held the sexual harassment claim was not time-barred and could proceed to a final hearing. | Other | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary hearing only: the tribunal held the unfair dismissal claim was not time-barred and could proceed to a final hearing. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble
- section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.