Case 4106669/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 4106669/2017 Ms C Friel v Glasgow City Council Glasgow Life — 2025
- Case reference
- 4106669/2017
- Decision date
- 1 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 4106669/2017 Ms C Friel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 1 August 2025, Employment Judge F Eccles struck out Ms C Friel's claim against Glasgow City Council and Glasgow Life under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the ground that the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not set out the substantive nature of the claim, beyond the case listing and parties named on the decision.
The tribunal recorded that on 20 June 2025 it had given the claimant until 11 July 2025 either to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing to address that issue. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The short judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim. The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.