Case 4106775/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Mullen v Royal London Mutual Insurance Society — 2025
- Case reference
- 4106775/2024
- Decision date
- 15 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Mullen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the open preliminary hearing on 13 January 2025 before Employment Judge M Robison, the tribunal considered the claimant’s amendment application together with the respondent’s strike-out and time-bar objections. The tribunal granted the claimant’s applications to amend her written and oral particulars in the main, treating the revised particulars as further specification at an early stage and noting that such amendments by a party litigant would usually be approached sympathetically where prejudice to the respondent was likely to be limited.
The tribunal dismissed upon withdrawal the claims under section 47B and sections 44 and 100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant confirmed that she was not insisting on the whistleblowing claim because she had misunderstood the law, and she also accepted that the health and safety claims were misconceived.
The tribunal allowed an amendment to include constructive unfair dismissal, based on the claimant’s resignation on 18 November 2024, alleged breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, and the grievance appeal outcome said to be the last straw. It also allowed the amended disability discrimination claims to proceed for final hearing, including direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, reasonable adjustments, indirect disability discrimination, and harassment related to disability, but made no merits findings on those live claims. The tribunal held over the time-bar issue, noting the claimant’s position that any discrimination formed part of a continuing act, and fixed the final hearing for 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 14 April 2025 before a full panel in Edinburgh.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Section 47B ERA whistleblowing detriment claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed by order; no merits determination was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claims under sections 44 and 100 ERA 1996 concerning health and safety detriment/dismissal were withdrawn and dismissed; no merits determination was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- continuing act
- time bar
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.