Case 4106803/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106803/2023 Held via Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on January 2024 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr M Doyle v Reigart Contracts Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106803/2023
- Decision date
- 22 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106803/2023 Held via Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on January 2024 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr M Doyle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not lodge an ET3 and the claim proceeded undefended. The tribunal heard evidence from Mr Mark Doyle, found him measured, consistent, convincing, credible and reliable, and accepted his account. It found that he started work as a Supervisor on 10 July 2023 and was not provided with a written statement of particulars of employment.
The tribunal found that Mr Doyle was summarily dismissed on 15 August 2023 when he reported for work after a day's sickness absence. It was satisfied that the respondent made a deduction from his final wage, said to relate to training costs, but that the deduction was not authorised by statute, contract, or written consent. The tribunal held that the deduction was an unlawful deduction from wages under s.23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and awarded £500.
Because Mr Doyle had been employed for more than one month, the tribunal found that he was entitled to one week's statutory notice. The respondent's failure to give that notice was a breach of contract, and the tribunal awarded £650, reflecting his weekly pay. It also found that the respondent had failed to provide written particulars of employment as required by s.1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal held that, because both successful claims were listed in Schedule 5 of the Employment Act 2002, it had to award the minimum amount of two weeks' pay for the written particulars failure. It therefore awarded a further £1,300, bringing the total award to £2,450.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim under s.23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from final wages and awarded £500, which the claimant said he was content to receive. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for failure to give one week's statutory notice of termination after summary dismissal; the claimant earned £650 per week. | Upheld | — | £650 |
| Other | Statutory compensation for failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment, awarded under s.38 of the Employment Act 2002 in the sum of £1,300 (two weeks' pay). | Upheld | — | £1,300 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,450
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Schedule 5 Employment Act 2002
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.