Case 4106946/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4106946/2023 Miss A MANNAPARAMBIL v Ahro Scientific Publishing Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106946/2023
- Decision date
- 23 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peter O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4106946/2023 Miss A MANNAPARAMBIL
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant's claims for notice pay and redundancy pay under Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure on the basis that they had no reasonable prospect of success. The tribunal held that both claims only arise where an employee is dismissed, whereas it was common ground that the claimant had resigned from her employment, so no entitlement to either notice pay or redundancy pay arose on the facts found.
The tribunal also noted that the claimant did not have two years' service, which is required for a right to redundancy pay under section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. A letter dated 23 January 2024 gave the claimant the opportunity to object or request a hearing under Rule 37(2), but no response was received. The tribunal therefore struck out the two claims, while recording that the remaining claims for arrears of pay and holiday remained live.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay was struck out under Rule 37(1)(a) because the claimant had resigned, so no entitlement to notice pay arose. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | Claim for redundancy pay was struck out under Rule 37(1)(a) because the claimant had resigned and did not have two years' service required by section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
- Rule 37(2) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
- section 155 Employment Rights Act 1996
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.