Case 4107135/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4107135/2015 Ms S Greenway v Cordia (Services) LLP — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107135/2015
- Decision date
- 21 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4107135/2015 Ms S Greenway
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 1 June 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 15 June 2021, or to request a hearing, in order to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that the claimant did not respond with an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, specifically on the ground in rule 37(1)(d) that the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not determine the merits of the underlying dispute and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. The underlying substantive claim type is not specified in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.