Case 4107300/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Pradzynska v Hotel in the Skye Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4107300/2022
- Decision date
- 27 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Mackay
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Pradzynska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Glasgow on 21 February 2023 before Employment Judge R Mackay, Miss D Pradzynska succeeded on her claim that Hotel in the Skye Ltd had failed to pay accrued holiday pay entitlement. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £504.40 gross, with the respondent liable to account for any income tax or national insurance contributions that may be due.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims concerning unpaid tips and the respondent's failure to provide her with access to a pension scheme. The reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the extract records that no written reasons would be provided unless a valid written request was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant in respect of accrued holiday pay entitlement and awarded £504.40 gross. | Upheld | — | £504 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismisses the claim in respect of unpaid tips. The extract does not specify the statutory basis, but the issue is recorded as a separate monetary employment claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment dismisses the claim that the respondent failed to provide the claimant with access to a pension scheme. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £504
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.