Case 4107379/2020 · Employment Tribunal
: Dr S Singh & Mr G Coyle Mr L Isah v Secretary of State For The Home Department — 2022
- Case reference
- 4107379/2020
- Decision date
- 14 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Strain Members
- Panel members
- Dr S Singh, Mr G Coyle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
: Dr S Singh & Mr G Coyle Mr L Isah
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims of direct discrimination, victimisation and harassment. The written judgment records that oral reasons were provided to the parties at the conclusion of the hearing, but it does not set out the reasoning in the extracted text.
The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,000 in respect of accrued holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment refers to direct discrimination being dismissed but does not state the protected characteristic in the extracted judgment text; race is inferred from the listing category. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation claim dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | The judgment refers to harassment being dismissed but does not state the protected characteristic in the extracted judgment text; race is inferred from the listing category. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Holiday pay | Respondent ordered to pay £1,000 in respect of accrued holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.